Discussion:Diagnostic des conceptions préalables sur la nature de la science

De Wiki-TEDia
Révision datée du 28 mars 2014 à 04:37 par Bpudelko (discussion | contributions) (Page créée avec « compléter avec cet article : Aydeniz, M., & Bilican, K. (2013). What do scientists know about the nature of science? A case study of novice scientists’ views of nos. I... »)
(diff) ← Version précédente | Voir la version actuelle (diff) | Version suivante → (diff)
Sauter à la navigation Sauter à la recherche

compléter avec cet article :

Aydeniz, M., & Bilican, K. (2013). What do scientists know about the nature of science? A case study of novice scientists’ views of nos. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1-33. doi: 10.1007/s10763-013-9449-1 Abstract : The purpose of this study was to explore 15 graduate research assistants’ understanding of the nature of science. Data were collected through administration of a modified version of the Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire (VNOS-C). The findings suggest that graduate research assistants held underdeveloped views related to several nature of science (NOS) aspects including the argumentative nature of science, the process of modeling in science, scientists’ treatment of unexpected results, collaborative nature of science, and the process of theory formation. The discussion focuses on the missing link in preparation of future scientists and offers suggestions to address the learning needs of graduate research assistants regarding their understanding of NOS.